Project: doctolib-doctolib · Branch: .invalid · Mode: · Model: claude-opus-4-7 Stats: 1 user messages, 47 tool calls, tools used: Bash, Read. Conversation Turn 1 — User Review PR #241763 (doctolib/doctolib) titled "fix(LION-1307): refactor to prepare account.organizations getter removal and related changes" by Adrien Anelli. Context: This Ruby/Rails PR in the ti_connect engine prepares for the upcoming removal of the account.organizations getter. It refactors policies and controllers to use the new organization membership pattern (e.g. account.all_current_organization_ids) and updates tests accordingly. It is a backend-only PR (no frontend changes). Where to read code: - Worktree: /Users/USER/workspace/doctolib/worktrees/doctolib/LION-1307-ti-connect - Full unified diff: /tmp/pr-241763.diff Files changed (focus your review on these — read them in full from the worktree, not just the diff): Source: - engines/ti_connect/app/controllers/ti_connect/organizations/connector_configurations_controller.rb - engines/ti_connect/app/controllers/ti_connect/practices/connector_configurations_controller.rb - engines/ti_connect/app/policies/ti_connect/application_scope.rb - engines/ti_connect/app/policies/ti_connect/configuration_policy.rb - engines/ti_connect/app/policies/ti_connect/connector_policy.rb Tests: - engines/ti_connect/test/controllers/ti_connect/organizations/connector_configurations_controller_test.rb - engines/ti_connect/test/controllers/ti_connect/practices/connector_configurations_controller_test.rb - engines/ti_connect/test/controllers/ti_connect/practices/connectors_controller_test.rb - engines/ti_connect/test/controllers/ti_connect/workplaces_controller_test.rb - engines/ti_connect/test/policies/ti_connect/connector_policy_test.rb - engines/ti_connect/test/policies/ti_connect/workplace_policy_test.rb - engines/ti_connect/test/public/ti_connect/api/connector_test.rb - test/integration/configuration/ti_connect/ti_connect_configuration_page_test.rb - test/integration/configuration/ti_connect/ti_workplace_configuration_page_test.rb Key things to verify against Doctolib guidelines: 1. Engine boundaries: any cross-engine model access must go through EngineName::Api:: (the public folder). Flag direct internal model access from other engines or the monolith. 2. Patient base / patient account isolation rules (probably not applicable here, but check). 3. Pundit policy patterns: scope correctness, no permission leaks, consistent use of current_organization vs current_account. 4. Code style: rubocop conventions, no SQL strings in scopes when ActiveRecord can express it, not_trashed usage if relevant. 5. Behaviour preservation: did the refactor change authorization semantics (broader/narrower access than before)? DO NOT post anything to GitHub. Output your findings as terminal text. Output format — use Conventional Comments (