{
  "id": "pro-desktop/agile-moseying-breeze-subagent-aprompt_",
  "slug": "agile-moseying-breeze-subagent-aprompt_",
  "title": "Session: agile-moseying-breeze-subagent-aprompt_ — 2026-02-04",
  "type": "source",
  "project": "pro-desktop",
  "date": "2026-02-04",
  "started": "2026-02-04T08:19:56.810000+00:00",
  "ended": "2026-02-04T08:20:07.474000+00:00",
  "model": "claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929",
  "cwd": "/Users/USER/workspace/doctolib/doctolib-pro-desktop",
  "git_branch": "FHIR-1996_track-ecc-rsa-certificate-usage",
  "permission_mode": "",
  "user_messages": 1,
  "tool_calls": 0,
  "tools_used": [],
  "is_subagent": true,
  "wikilinks_out": [],
  "body_text": "Project: pro-desktop · Branch: FHIR-1996_track-ecc-rsa-certificate-usage · Mode:  · Model: claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929\n\nStats: 1 user messages, 0 tool calls, tools used: none.\n\nConversation\n\nTurn 0 — Assistant\n\nThe commit was blocked by the pre-commit hook. The pre-commit hook runs TypeScript checking and found pre-existing errors in the codebase (missing design system modules) that are unrelated to our changes.\n\nOptions:\n\n1. Skip the pre-commit hook (requires explicit permission):\n      git commit --no-verify -m \"...\"\n\n   \n2. Fix the pre-existing TypeScript errors first (not recommended for this PR)\n\n3. Check if there's a way to configure the hook to only check staged files\n\nOur changes are valid - all our modified files pass TypeScript, tests, and formatting checks. The blocking errors are in unrelated files.\n\nHow would you like to proceed? Should I skip the pre-commit hook for this commit since the errors are pre-existing?\n\nTurn 1 — User\n\n[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]\n\nFIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.\n\nYour job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.\n\nTHE TEST: Would they think \"I was just about to type that\"?\n\nEXAMPLES:\nUser asked \"fix the bug and run tests\", bug is fixed → \"run the tests\"\nAfter code written → \"try it out\"\nClaude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation\nClaude asks to continue → \"yes\" or \"go ahead\"\nTask complete, obvious follow-up → \"commit this\" or \"push it\"\nAfter error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)\n\nBe specific: \"run the tests\" beats \"continue\".\n\nNEVER SUGGEST:\n- Evaluative (\"looks good\", \"thanks\")\n- Questions (\"what about...?\")\n- Claude-voice (\"Let me...\", \"I'll...\", \"Here's...\")\n- New ideas they didn't ask about\n- Multiple sentences\n\nStay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.\n\nFormat: 2-12 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.\n\nReply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.\n\nTurn 1 — Assistant\n\nyes, skip the hook",
  "sha256": "b591c71497c456b4",
  "source_url": "sessions/pro-desktop/2026-02-04T08-19-pro-desktop-agile-moseying-breeze-subagent-aprompt_.html"
}