Session: agile-moseying-breeze-subagent-aprompt_ — 2026-02-04

pro-desktop · Claude · branch FHIR-1996_track-ecc-rsa-certificate-usage · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 · 2026-02-04 09:03 · 1 msgs · 2 min read · updated 3 months ago

[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

← pro-desktop Download .md .txt .json
Token usage98.4K total
Input18
Cache creation28.7K
Cache read69.7K
Output9
Cache hit ratio71%· warming up

Project: pro-desktop · Branch: FHIR-1996_track-ecc-rsa-certificate-usage · Mode: ` · **Model:**claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`

Stats: 1 user messages, 0 tool calls, tools used: none.

Conversation

Turn 0 — Assistant

Perfect! I've successfully updated the PR description for #6979. Here's what changed:

Updated PR Description

Reflects Current Implementation - Documents the unified tiConnectEventObservability pattern with TrackingEvent.KbvTiConnect - Describes the extracted trackCertificateType() function - Highlights the 19 comprehensive tests (including ECC, RSA, and TI environment tests)

Added FHIR-2018 Reference - Included a "Next Steps" section with link to FHIR-2018 - Clearly separates the dashboard work as a follow-up ticket - Lists the specific dashboard visualizations to be implemented

Accurate Technical Details - Shows the actual data structure sent to Datadog - Documents the nested try-catch error handling pattern - Explains the "best-effort" observability approach

The PR description now accurately reflects all the refactoring work done in the branch and properly references the separate Datadog dashboard ticket.

🔗 PR URL: https://github.com/doctolib/doctolib-pro-desktop/pull/6979

Turn 1 — User

[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES: User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests" After code written → "try it out" Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead" Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it" After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST: - Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks") - Questions ("what about...?") - Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...") - New ideas they didn't ask about - Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-12 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.

Keyboard shortcuts

⌘K / Ctrl+KOpen command palette
/Focus search
g hGo to home
g pGo to projects
g sGo to sessions
j / kNext / prev row (tables)
?Show this help
EscClose dialogs

Structured queries

Mix key:value filters with free text in the palette:

type:sessionOnly session pages
project:llm-wikiFilter by project name (substring)
model:claudeFilter by model name (substring)
date:>2026-03-01Sessions after a date
date:<2026-04-01Sessions before a date
tags:rustPages mentioning a tag/topic
sort:dateSort results by date (newest first)

Example: type:session project:llm-wiki date:>2026-04 sort:date