Session: agile-moseying-breeze-subagent-aprompt_ — 2026-02-04

pro-desktop · Claude · branch FHIR-1996_track-ecc-rsa-certificate-usage · claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929 · 2026-02-04 08:19 · 1 msgs · 2 min read · updated 3 months ago

[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

← pro-desktop Download .md .txt .json
Token usage403.3K total
Input28
Cache creation227.4K
Cache read175.9K
Output5
Cache hit ratio44%· cold cache

Project: pro-desktop · Branch: FHIR-1996_track-ecc-rsa-certificate-usage · Mode: ` · **Model:**claude-sonnet-4-5-20250929`

Stats: 1 user messages, 0 tool calls, tools used: none.

Conversation

Turn 0 — Assistant

The commit was blocked by the pre-commit hook. The pre-commit hook runs TypeScript checking and found pre-existing errors in the codebase (missing design system modules) that are unrelated to our changes.

Options:

  1. Skip the pre-commit hook (requires explicit permission): ```bash git commit --no-verify -m "..."

```

  1. Fix the pre-existing TypeScript errors first (not recommended for this PR)

  2. Check if there's a way to configure the hook to only check staged files

Our changes are valid - all our modified files pass TypeScript, tests, and formatting checks. The blocking errors are in unrelated files.

How would you like to proceed? Should I skip the pre-commit hook for this commit since the errors are pre-existing?

Turn 1 — User

[SUGGESTION MODE: Suggest what the user might naturally type next into Claude Code.]

FIRST: Look at the user's recent messages and original request.

Your job is to predict what THEY would type - not what you think they should do.

THE TEST: Would they think "I was just about to type that"?

EXAMPLES: User asked "fix the bug and run tests", bug is fixed → "run the tests" After code written → "try it out" Claude offers options → suggest the one the user would likely pick, based on conversation Claude asks to continue → "yes" or "go ahead" Task complete, obvious follow-up → "commit this" or "push it" After error or misunderstanding → silence (let them assess/correct)

Be specific: "run the tests" beats "continue".

NEVER SUGGEST: - Evaluative ("looks good", "thanks") - Questions ("what about...?") - Claude-voice ("Let me...", "I'll...", "Here's...") - New ideas they didn't ask about - Multiple sentences

Stay silent if the next step isn't obvious from what the user said.

Format: 2-12 words, match the user's style. Or nothing.

Reply with ONLY the suggestion, no quotes or explanation.

Turn 1 — Assistant

yes, skip the hook

Keyboard shortcuts

⌘K / Ctrl+KOpen command palette
/Focus search
g hGo to home
g pGo to projects
g sGo to sessions
j / kNext / prev row (tables)
?Show this help
EscClose dialogs

Structured queries

Mix key:value filters with free text in the palette:

type:sessionOnly session pages
project:llm-wikiFilter by project name (substring)
model:claudeFilter by model name (substring)
date:>2026-03-01Sessions after a date
date:<2026-04-01Sessions before a date
tags:rustPages mentioning a tag/topic
sort:dateSort results by date (newest first)

Example: type:session project:llm-wiki date:>2026-04 sort:date